By the Waters of Babylon Essay

true statement is a disfranchised deer to hunt. If you eat too much fairness at once, you may leave of the truth. It was non idly that our starts for severee the deceased Places.The truth is a very important affaire for an individual. It can be very useful or very destructive depending on how it is used. The significance of the quote do by tricks father could be broken down in to three different sections according to each statement. First of these statements is Truth is a had deer to hunt. the second of these statements is If you eat too much truth at once, you may die of the truth. and the final statement is It was not idly that our fathers forbade the wild Places.Truth is a hard deer to hunt. The true(a) center of the statement could be interpreted as the truth is hard to find. Then the question arises, is it hard to find fleshlyly or is it hard to grasp mentally? A good moral of the physical part of finding the truth was when John went on his journey to the Dead Places. A good example of grasping the truth mentally was when he saw the dead god in the chair, but upon further examination he realized he was a man rather than a god. The correct description is the second one the truth is hard to grasp. For example you could tell a person the truth, but until they yield been provided evidence or mental reassurance they might not want to believe the truth making it hard to grasp or in the words of Johns father a hard deer to hunt.This leads to the next statement If you eat too much truth at once, you may die of the truth. The meaning of this statement is that the truth can be very dangerous. It is also related to the first statement in the sense that once a person grasps and understands the truth, the next stage is how they atomic number 18 going to react to it. If its a good thing they mightreact positively, but if its a bad thing then its vice versa. In the case of the John and his pile the truth is neither bad nor good rather it is differe nt in the sense that it could be what they want it to be. They could both eat the truth and use it to better themselves and their way of life or they could die of the truth and use it to cause sanatorium and destruction as the gods had done. The more likely of the two to occur is the second one.The reason for that is the fact that the truth is against the beliefs of the agglomerate hatful and when something is against the beliefs or customs of someone they dont tend to believe it. In this case the hill people would have a hard time believing that the gods they believe in were actually people and will get confused between reality and religion. Also if the hill people learn of the advanced technology that the gods had then they might or might not use it in a productive way and cause destruction upon themselves like the god had.This leads to the last sentence It was not idly that our fathers forbade the Dead Places. This means that their fathers had a reason when they decided to for bid the people from going to the Dead Places. The reason that they had was to protect their people from the unknown and the truth to ensure their well being and safety. The fathers of the hill people did not want the same ending for their people as it had been for the gods or people before them. They knew that if the hill people got the technology or weapons that the gods or people before them had then there would be a great possibility of chaos and destruction. In order for them to protect their people the fathers created rules and customs, but they also go away their people in the dark.Finally, I personally do not agree with this implication because I do not believe in keeping the truth from anyone. I also think that leaders should not keep a truth as big as this one from their people, even though their intentions are to protect society. Keeping thetruth from the people is looking at only one perspective. How did the fathers know that the truth would abrogate the people? Knowled ge is something a person must share for the betterment of society. Instead of shutting finish up the past, the fathers should have opened it up to there people and teach their people to learn from the mistakes of the past.John, a priest and a son of a priest went against his predecessors and learned about the previous civilization and its mistakes. This made him understand how to create a civilization that would last. It also makes him a better leader. In the end John thinks, But they were men who built the city, not gods or demons. They were men. I remember the dead mans face. They were men who were here before us. We must build again. This is proof that the implication is wrong and that it creates restrictionsupon John people. By John thinking like this he will enable his people to move forward, remove the restrictions in their lives, and create a thirst of knowledge that will make his people better rather than worse.